Moodle
(https://moodle.org/)
and Desire2learn (http://www.desire2learn.com/)
are asynchronous online learning technologies.
Of course, the big name in this act is Blackboard, which Walden uses,
but since we are all familiar with that, I decided to have a look at some other
names in the business.
On the first page of Moodle, I clicked on “Join Us” and
was taken to another page where there were several links to various
discussions. Of course, the discussion
topic I zeroed in on was entitled “Teaching with Moodle”. This page was a kind of troubleshooting /
suggestion grab-bag page, where teachers either wrote about glitches and other
technical problems, or where they simply posted questions on anything from how
to implement a particular learning objective to how to split a class of one
hundred plus students into groups. I
went back to the main “Join Us” page and this time clicked on “Lounge”, which
is where teachers share anything from articles and links of interest or
teaching suggestions and lesson plans.
I then decided to take a tour of the facilities and was
impressed with the user-friendly interface and the customizable dashboard. The interface is specifically designed to be compatible
with mobile technologies, which is a significant advantage as learning becomes
more and more mobile (Park, 2011).
Moodle contains many tools (such as wikis, forums, and chats) to
promote, foster, and implement collaborative learning. Basically, I got the impression that Moodle
is teacher- and user-friendly, and as anyone who has ever taken an online
course knows, that kind of friendliness is one of the most important factors to
consider when incorporating learning management systems into courses. At the end of the day, how pretty the page is
and whether or not it is compatible with your mobile will not matter if, among
other things, your students have problems accessing their pages, you cannot see
their grades, or announcement do not get published in time.
Neither Moodle nor Desire2learn appear to have such
problems. Desire2learn is not that
different from Moodle. Indeed, perhaps
it is safe to assume, on a superficial level at least, that all LMSs are more
or less variations on a similar theme.
The basic premise is this: Teachers get to put their courses online and
manage them quite easily. With distance
learning becoming ever more prevalent (Bonk, 2009), LMSs are going to become
more and more important in our lives.
Who knows, with learning becoming ongoing and lifelong, perhaps LMS and
social networking will combine to form a symbiotic whole in which learning and
networking are one and the same.
Fantastical as that may sound, it probably will not
provide learning in a formal capacity.
In fact, while I was reading class materials for the assignments this
week I kept asking myself what the difference was between open learning and
distance learning. Of course, the differences
became clear as I was reading and the main difference is that distance learning
is formal and credited. Therefore, the
utopic and fantasy combination of social networking and LMS would be fine if we
were talking about open learning.
Indeed, if you go to the MIT OpenCourseWare website, you can see links
to their Facebook and Twitter pages.
However, when it comes to official and formal learning endeavors, it
would perhaps be better to stick with LMS and network with classmates via the
tools provided by the system.
There is no doubt that such technologies enhance adult
learning. I mean, that is what we are
doing right now, is it not? We are
benefiting from an LMS and we are receiving a formal credited education through
it. In a language learning context and
LMS can provide learners with valuable opportunities to practice online. Mostly, the LMS is used for work on grammar
or practicing reading skills. The main
thing to keep in mind is that along with the efficiency of the LMS, the
meaningfulness of the tasks is equally important. If we do not provide learners with learning
tasks and objectives that are meaningful to them, then using LMS would be no
different than any other kind of teaching-learning interaction.
References
Bonk,
C. J. (2009). The world is open: How web technology is revolutionizing
education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Park,
Y. (2011). A pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing
educational applications of mobile technologies into four types. International
Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(2), 78–102.
Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
Kemal,
ReplyDeleteGreat Blog post on Moodle, which I am very familiar with and used extensively in my first semester of my graduate degree program in Adult Education. I would like to add that the focus of the Moodle project is to give trainers the best tools to manage and promote learning. Many companies use it as their platform to conduct fully online courses, while some use it simply to augment face-to-face courses, previously defined as blended learning.